<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Upgraded to WordPress 1.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.papercut.com/blog/matt/2005/02/20/upgraded-to-wordpress-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.papercut.com/blog/matt/2005/02/20/upgraded-to-wordpress-15/</link>
	<description>Keep an eye on what the PaperCut developers are up to ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:46:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yusuf Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.papercut.com/blog/matt/2005/02/20/upgraded-to-wordpress-15/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Yusuf Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papercut.biz/blog/2005/02/20/upgraded-to-wordpress-15/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also installed WP1.5 and I intend to move my MT blog over to it, because I&#039;ve had all sorts of problems with MT, like spam, and I&#039;ve had friends say they won&#039;t touch MT now because of this.  The only problem I&#039;ve found is the links to the RSS feeds at the bottom - the link begins &quot;feed:http://&quot;, which my browser (Mozilla Camino) doesn&#039;t recognise as a protocol (and I&#039;m not sure how many others do, either).  I recorded my first impressions of it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogistan.co.uk/mt/archives/2005/02/wordpress_15_fi.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also installed WP1.5 and I intend to move my MT blog over to it, because I&#8217;ve had all sorts of problems with MT, like spam, and I&#8217;ve had friends say they won&#8217;t touch MT now because of this.  The only problem I&#8217;ve found is the links to the RSS feeds at the bottom &#8211; the link begins &#8220;feed:http://&#8221;, which my browser (Mozilla Camino) doesn&#8217;t recognise as a protocol (and I&#8217;m not sure how many others do, either).  I recorded my first impressions of it <a href="http://www.blogistan.co.uk/mt/archives/2005/02/wordpress_15_fi.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

